## The Golden Ratio and Quantum Mechanics

Researchers [...] have for the first time observed a nanoscale symmetry hidden in solid state matter. They have measured the signatures of a symmetry showing the same attributes as the golden ratio famous from art and architecture.

[...]

On the atomic scale particles do not behave as we know it in the macro-atomic world. New properties emerge which are the result of an effect known as the Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle. [...]

[...]

When applying a magnetic field at right angles to an aligned spin the magnetic chain will transform into a new state called quantum critical, which can be thought of as a quantum version of a fractal pattern. [...] We have tuned the system exactly in order to turn it quantum critical.”

By tuning the system and artificially introducing more quantum uncertainty the researchers observed that the chain of atoms acts like a nanoscale guitar string. [...] “Here the tension comes from the interaction between spins causing them to magnetically resonate. For these interactions we found a series (scale) of resonant notes: The first two notes show a perfect relationship with each other. Their frequencies (pitch) are in the ratio of 1.618…, which is the golden ratio famous from art and architecture.” [...] “It reflects a beautiful property of the quantum system — a hidden symmetry. Actually quite a special one called E8 by mathematicians, and this is its first observation in a material,” [...]

[...] “Such discoveries are leading physicists to speculate that the quantum, atomic scale world may have its own underlying order. Similar surprises may await researchers in other materials in the quantum critical state.”

(Link)

Tags: Golden Ratio, Mathematics, Physics, Quantum Mechanics

This entry was posted on Saturday, January 9th, 2010 at 5:04 pm and is filed under Uncategorized.
You can follow any comments to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.

After the experimental discovery of the golden mean in quantum mechanics there is no room anymore for conventional skepticism. Those who think in conventional terms that golden mean base quantum mechanics is pseudoscience are themselves pseudo scientists. You could say pseudoscience if we are still talking about a theory. On the other hand to deny experimental result confirming the theoretical work of dozens of researchers is pseudo philosophy per se. The golden mean was discovered in relativity by Sigalotti. It is the basis of the first rational explanation of the two slit experiment by the Egyptian Mohamed El Naschie. It underpins high energy physics as discussed by Slovenian Crnjac, Chinese Ji Huan He as well as many of their associates. El Naschie presented the first complete theory of unification based on golden geometry and golden quantum field theory. Golden geometry and topology was developed in Romania by two mathematicians. A recent magnificent book by a noted Soviet scientist Alexei Stakhov bears witness for the reality and theoretical soundness of the golden mean quantum mechanics. There will be always those who confuse rigorousness with a stubborn narrow mindedness. Those who still are able to claim that anything to do with the golden mean is esoteric and pseudo science is incarnation of narrow-mindedness masquerading in the form of stubborn mathematical rigor.

There is a highly interesting connection between science and religion which comes out as a by-product of El Naschie’s discovery of golden mean geometry and quantum golden mean theory. For a few hundred years facts and values were separated. Science is the world of facts. Morality and art is the world of values. Since Islamic science and later on Francis Bacon, the scientific method dealt only with facts. Anything dealing with values was called philosophy or religion even when facts are also involved. Needless to say art, music, emotions and beauty are all things related to values. It follows then that the golden mean which was used by the Egyptians, the Greeks and the Renaissance artists is a fundamental tool in the world of values. It is fundamental to art and consequently emotions, morality and religion. It has something to do with good and bad. You cannot give a definite objective reason for something being beautiful. Never the less we know and feel the beauty of a golden mean composition whether it is in the visual or audio arts. Here comes then the surprise. To discover the golden mean as the basis of quantum mechanics is tantamount to discovering that there is a bridge between the world of values and the world of facts. The experimental confirmation of the golden mean in quantum mechanics and the basic correctness of Mohamed El Naschie’s theory of Cantorian spacetime, which is based on the golden mean, is an irrefutable proof of what people sensed long ago but were not able to demonstrate in a mathematical way, namely that art, religion, mathematics and natural science are somehow deeply interconnected. The experimental work at the Helm Holtz Inst. in Germany and the theory of El Naschie and his colleagues is a radical departure from an old paradigm which lasted for over a thousand years. We can no longer claim that there is no connection between love and reason or emotions and facts. We do not yet have a complete proof. We are not even at the beginning. However with El Naschie’s theory experimentally confirmed, we may be at the beginning of the beginning of a new era in science, philosophy, art and religion.

I am pleased that the truth has prevailed. Nature is now accused of trying to undermine Mohamed El Naschie deliberately. This accusation is not frivolous. How else can we explain the blind vicious attack by certain doubtful blogs on the golden mean work of El Naschie and how Quirin Schiermeier the journalist working for Nature utilized these vicious attacks to write a completely unacceptable article in Nature. Then came the heavenly justice when a German professor von Storch complained on his blog that the Nature article of Schiermeier deliberately misquoted him. He was gentle enough to say that the harm was not great. However in principle the harm could have been great. No one has the right to smear the reputation of anyone whether deliberately or recklessly due to irresponsible journalism. Now to the burning scientific question. How does the golden mean enter into quantum mechanics. The answer is as simple as it is ingenious. Mohamed El Naschie reformulates quantum mechanics in spacetime following the same concepts used by Richard Feynman as well the classical work of Einstein. Since the building blocks of spacetime are his elementary random Cantor sets and because these random Cantor sets possess the golden mean as a Hausdorff dimension, the golden mean slips into the fundaments of quantum mechanics. Nothing that quantum mechanics is the most fundamental theory upon which science is based, the golden mean could rightly be described as the basis of science. From this reasoning the ideas which Ed Nash expressed in his previous comment follows effortlessly.

It is fascinating that El Naschie’s theory was verified experimentally by the very people who have long doubted or even suppressed it, namely the establishment. You can call it whatever you like but even among the establishment there are many free spirits who would not sacrifice the truth no matter what. What did Mohamed El Naschie do exactly to get the golden mean result which those at Helm Holz Inst. and Oxford have confirmed experimentally. In one of his remarkable papers entitled The Mass Spectrum of High Energy Physics published for the first time in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals El Naschie replaced the current algebra by a new algebra called fusion algebra. The golden mean appears naturally in fusion algebra as the ratio of the two fundamental light quarks, the up and the down. Recalling that a meson is made of two quarks, the result of the experiment follows. In El Naschie’s theory the golden mean is a ratio of two masses related to quarks. Mind you it is not the constituent quarks mass. It is the mathematical quarks mass which El Naschie derives. You should also see how he obtained the electromagnetic fine structure constant. The alpha quantization of El Naschie was noted long ago by many mindful experimentalists. However it is El Naschie who observed that the golden mean is more fundamental that alpha. When I have some time I will try to dig out the exact references to make it easy for those who would like to understand E-infinity theory rather than beating around the bush.

It was in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Vol. 14, p. 369, 2002. The paper by El Naschie was entitled On the exact mass spectrum of quarks. This is the first time I saw the ratio of two elementary particle masses to be equal to the golden mean. This is an exact result which follows from his four dimensional fusion algebra. Now everyone is talking about fractals in quantum mechanics and the golden mean. Very recently Ali Yazdani at Princeton University, USA observed fractals in quantum mechanics. The golden mean is related to area preservation as noted by El Naschie. A golden mean scaling plays a similar role in fractal trees. Before El Naschie no one related these things to quantum mechanics. The Egyptian had the right intuition right from the start and he should be commended for his achievements several decades before anyone else. I find the attacks on him a clear sign of something malignant in our scientific community.

Anyone who would like for whatever reason to doubt the priority of Mohamed El Naschie in discovering the golden mean as the basis of quantum geometry and thus quantum mechanics, should read the following three papers in the chronological order: First, The Golden Mean in Quantum Geometry, Knot Theory and Related Topics, published in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol, 10, No 8, pp. 1303-1307, 1999. Second, Superstrings, Knots and Non-Commutative Geometry in E Infinity Space, published in the International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 37, No. 12, 1998. Third, On a class of general theories for high energy particle physics, published in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 14(2002) 649-668. Mohamed El Naschie was ahead of everybody else in this field for at least fifteen years. Those who do not want to admit the truth are betrayals of the truth. Such people can never call themselves scientists.

To all, Yes El naschie is a real spark in the human written history. Please don’t forget the well experimentally verified results about fiber wool pioneered by Huan. Who showed that the Hausdorff dimension of fiber wool is to be about 4.2325, very close to El Naschie’s E-infinity dimension, 4.2360. According to Huan this reveals an optimal structure for wool fibers. This is an easy proved fact and it doesn’t need high energy.

Also the extra ordinary talent of El naschie in revealing a deep connection between double slit experiment and particle physics. Again his extraordinary ability in doing simple calculations and getting non-perturbative results. While ordinary people can get results by using supper computer in one year, El naschie get the same results straight forward by counting on his fingers.

Again with a simple rope with knots El naschie could derive the spectrum of possible Elementary particles, and realy this the discovery of the century.

Any one can just bring a rope with knots and could easily testify El naschie’s conjecture.

El naschie may be the greatest thinker in the history of mankind and his theory is the most important discovery since the invention of wheel.

Another recent article about El naschie and his unique fraudulence. The article also mentioned Huan, who is one of greatest suporter of E-infinty.

The article is very tough and harsh.

Integrity Under Attack:

The State of Scholarly Publishing

By Douglas N. Arnold

http://www.ima.umn.edu/~arnold/siam-columns/integrity-under-attack.pdf

We hope El naschie will sue Douglas N. Arnold and wouldn’t say Who the hell is Marc Douglas?

I wish good luck for our El naschie the greatest crackpot of our time.

Short bit of the recent article about El naschie

Integrity Under Attack:

The State of Scholarly Publishing

By Douglas N. Arnold

http://www.ima.umn.edu/~arnold/siam-columns/integrity-under-attack.pdf

Rumors of editor and journal misconduct have dominated the highly publicized case of the applied math journal Chaos, Solitons and Fractals (CSF), published by Elsevier. As reported in a 2008 article in Nature,[2] “Five of the 36 papers in the December issue of Chaos, Solitons and Fractals alone were written by its editor-in-chief, Mohamed El Naschie. And the year to date has seen nearly 60 papers written by him appear in the journal.” In fact, of the 400 papers by El Naschie indexed in Web of Science, 307 were published in CSF while he was editor-in-chief. This extremely high rate of selfpublication by the editor-in-chief led to charges that normal standards of peer-review were not upheld at CSF; it has also had a large effect on the journal’s impact factor. (Thomson Reuters calculates the impact factor of a journal in a given year as C/A, where A is the number of articles published in the journal in the preceding two years, and C is the number of citations to those articles from articles indexed in the Thomson Reuters database and published in the given year.) El Naschie’s papers in CSF make 4992 citations, about 2000 of which are to papers published in CSF, largely his own. In 2007, of the 65 journals in the Thomson Reuters category “Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications,” CSF was ranked number 2.

Another journal whose high impact factor raises eyebrows is the International Journal of Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation (IJNSNS), founded in 2000 and published by Freund Publishing House. For the past three years, IJNSNS has had the highest impact factor in the category “Mathematics, Applied.” There are a variety of connections between IJNSNS and CSF. For example, Ji-Huan He, the founder and editor-in-chief of IJNSNS, is an editor of CSF, and El Naschie is one of the two co-editors of CSF; both publish copiously, not only in their own journals but also in each other’s, and they cite each other frequently.

Let me describe another element that contributes to IJNSNS’s high impact factor. The Institute of Physics (IOP) publishes Journal of Physics: Conference Series (JPCS). Conference organizers pay to have proceedings of their conferences published in JPCS, and, in the words of IOP, “JPCS asks Conference Organisers to handle the peer review of all papers.” Neither the brochure nor the website for JPCS lists an editorial board, nor does either describe any process for judging the quality of the conferences. Nonetheless, Thomson Reuters counts citations from JPCS in calculating impact factors. One of the 49 volumes of JPCS in 2008 was the proceedings of a conference organized by IJNSNS editor-in-chief He at his home campus, Shanghai Donghua University. This one volume contained 221 papers, with 366 references to papers in IJNSNS and 353 references to He. To give you an idea of the effect of this, had IJNSNS not received a single citation in 2008 beyond the ones in this conference proceedings, it would still have been assigned a larger impact factor than any SIAM journal except for SIAM Review.

For the great supporters of El naschie , here are

experimentally well verified results derived by the great Huan He.

You can check yours self a typical paper for Huan using E-infinity theory, and I think a high school student can easily judge that this absolute trash.

Hierarchy of wool fibers and its interpretation using E-infinity theory

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals,

Chaos,Solitons and Fractals 41 (2009)1839 –1841

Ji-Huan He, Zhong-Fu Ren, Jie Fan, Lan Xu

Abstract

Why do wool fibers show excellent advantages in warmth-retaining and many other practical properties? The paper concludes that their hierarchical structure is the key. Using E-infinity theory, its Hausdorff dimension is estimated to be about 4.2325, very close to El Naschie’s E-infinity dimension, 4.2360, revealing an optimal structure for wool fibers.

Then the same article again with little modifications

Hierarchy of Wool Fibers and Fractal Dimensions

International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation,9(3),293-296, 2008

http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1037&context=ji_huan_he

Abstract

Wool fiber shows excellent advantages in warmth-retaining and many other practical properties possibly due to its hierarchical structure. Its fractal dimension of wool fiber is calculated which is very close to the

Golden Mean, 1.618. The present study might provide a new interpretation for the reason why wool fiber has so many excellent properties.

I think every reader (even a niave one) can notice the confilict between the two abstracts, in the first fibre wool has dimension 4.2325 (which is greater than the embedding space) and in the second it is 1.618. I hope El naschie can explain these remarkable results.

In this concluding comment, I am going to show in a rigorous

mathematical language that El Nashie is isomorphic to a “Bad

Theoretical Physicist” according to tHoof definition and criteria .

Thooft criteria are:

(http://www.phys.uu.nl/~thooft/theoristbad.html)

1-It is much easier to become a bad theoretical physicist than a good one.

I know of many individual success stories.

El- For sure El Naschie is one of those stories.

2- Compare yourself with Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, Paul

Dirac.

El- This happened in many occasions. In his 60th

birthday celebration in China one reads in the preface of the

proceeding dedicated to him the following:

“Our Chinese Scientists on Nonlinear Dynamics are in infinite love

and admiration to both the man and his science.”

“Treading the path of El Naschie, we gather together to celebrate

the century’s greatest scientist after Newton and Einstein,

and share his greatest achievement.”

One can find more on the following link: http://www.ijnsns.com/conf/China1.doc

3- You may consider the option of connecting your work with mystery

topics such as telepathy and consciousness.

EL- This is one of El Naschie’ papers.

The brain and E-Infinity

Published in International journal of nonlinear sciences and numerical simulation

volume:7,issue: 2, pages:129-132 and published in the year 2006

Abstract: This short letter, in fact, this short telegram is mainly intended

to point out a recent and quite unexpected realization that E-Infinity space time

(E-infinity) theory (M. S. El Naschie,Chaos, Soliton & Fractals, 29 pp. 209-236 2004)

could be of a considerable help in deciphering one of the greatest secrets and

impenetrable questions of our own existence, namely what is consciousness and how

does it relate to the brain(G. M. Edelman. Consciousness. Penguin Books, London,2000).

4- Make outrageous claims of having solved long standing problems.

EL- El Naschie claims to have solved: Confinement, Quantum

Gravity, Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, explained the number

of elementary particles, the value of all gauge couplings..and

many other things…

5-The bad theoretical physicist, in anticipation,

names his own equations and effects, and even his entire theories, after himself right away.

EL- Feynman-El Naschie Hypothesis, El Naschie local

coherence…etc

6- Try to overshout all your critics, and have your work published anyway.

If the well-established science media refuse to publish your work,

start your own publishing company and edit your own books.

EL- El Naschie founded Chaos Solitons and Fractals journal and has to do with the one in China.

7- Your next step should be to advertise your work. Your reputation may have

caused the xxx ArXives and Wikipedia to refuse your submissions.

EL- El Naschie has been black-listed in xxx ArXives for affiliation arrogating

( forging).( http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0004152). More detail can

be found in ( http://archivefreedom.org/freedom/Cyberia.html).

8- You have convinced your friends at your local bar, your family, your pizza vendor, your dog,

and even a local radio station of the superiority of your theory.

El- Mohamed El Naschie answers a few questions about this month’s new

hot paper in the field of Engineering.

In addition, Dr. El Naschie gives an audio interview about his work.

This is can be found in: http://esi-topics.com/nhp/2006/september-06-MohamedElNaschie.html

Beside many interviews and TV shows in Egyptian channels.

9- But then there are those few physicists such as one bloke called Gerardus ‘t Hooft,

who shamelessly have pointed out to you that your theory is nonsense!

Should you take them seriously? Of course not.

Don’t even try to show them the details of your derivations,

which you forgot anyway and you might not be able to reproduce on the spot.

Here is what you do to establish your reputation forever: JUST GIVE THEM HELL.

Compare those obnoxious puppets of the establishment with nazis and

threaten them with law suits. That’ll teach them.

El- This is can be easily seen from his comments in different

blogs including this blog.

10- Lastly, we ask El Naschie to measure his John Baez index or

crackpot index mentioned in tHooft web

page. (http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html) of course

don’t confuse this with Atiyah-Singer or Witten index….

I think with the above ten commands we have shown in a non

refutable way that El Naschie is in one to one correspondence with

the criteria of a BAD THEORETICAL PHYSICIST. Congratulations for

being a champ!

How nice to see Said Elnashaie back with his silly comments. In what follows I would like to show in legal terms that Said is a criminal. Please consult the site called The Case of Said Elnashaie http://thecaseofsaidelnashaie.blogspot.com/2009/01/case-of-said-elnashaie.html#comments.

One has to be totally blinded by hatred not to acknowledge that the golden mean in quantum mechanics is the greatest surprise ever confirmed experimentally in the recent history of quantum mechanics. I for one was skeptical about El Naschie’s golden mean quantum mechanics. I was skeptical because I did not do the calculations for myself. I relied on hearsay and that there are many extravagant claims made in science based on the golden mean. That was my prejudice and my mistake. Doing the elementary calculation of the two slit experiment with quantum particles using El Naschie’s golden mean topological probability was a unique experience. See this confirm now in the laboratory is almost a divine experience. This is Paul Dirac’s criteria of beauty taken to its ultimate. It is breathtaking to know that nature is that subtle and that beautiful. Even someone who is as down to earth as Gerard ‘tHooft must admit that El Naschie’s quantum golden field theory is breathtaking in its simplicity and aesthetics. Maybe I am being over the top for the moment but you do not get every day an exact irrational value such as the golden mean coming out of a laboratory testing a fundamental theory.

Charles, your Web site against Said Elnaschaie misogynistically attacks the lovely and talented actress Jihan Fadel. She has no part in this controversy. May I suggest that you don’t like her because she has been in Egyptian movies like the wonderful Ice Cream in Gleem, in which she kisses a male actor? Or perhaps you are gay. As you know, I have tried to leave a comment on your site in her defense, but you did not allow it.

Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

I meant to direct my comments to Annonymous, not Charles. But they are probably the same person. Blogmaster, can you check whether the IP addresses of El Naschie’s supporters are being used to post under different names? They often do that.

I wrote a post about this thread:

Backlash at Martial Culture

Dr. Ray Munroe, a theoretical physicist with some understanding of El Naschie’s theory recently said on one of his comments I think in the Fqxi blog that only time will tell if El Naschie’s theory is correct. This is a sentence which is lovely and vague. It is a political sentence, not a scientific one. I guess Munroe knows very well that El Naschie’s theory is correct. He just finds it politically risky to identify himself with a theory about which he himself has written in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals when the author of the theory is under attack from Nature’s tabloid article. When science changes to politics then it is time for scientists to take arms against politics. The difference between politics and science is that in science you do not need to wait for time to prove it. All that you need is to compute it. A simple back of an envelope calculation would immediately show that a golden mean topology and geometry is the only logical solution for the two-slit experiment. If the building blocks of the geometry and topology of quantum spacetime is governed by the Hausdorff dimension of these blocks, then no wonder that this Hausdorff dimension will manifest itself in everything physical. The Hausdorff dimension is the golden mean. Consequently the most fundamental theory, namely quantum mechanics must be based on a golden mean spacetime. Such spacetime differs completely from the classical spacetime. It differs also from spacetime of general relativity. I cannot say that it also differs from the spacetime of quantum mechanics because classical quantum mechanics is not a spacetime theory. Therefore El Naschie’s E-infinity theory elevates quantum mechanics to a spacetime theory just like relativity and classical mechanics. Interestingly depending on the resolution you can obtain all geometry of all the three fundamental theories. You can move from 0.618033989… to a rational value of 0.5 and under circumstances unity and find all the limiting behavior you wish to discover and explore. It is that complex and yet that simple. In fact cellular automata is just another form of the above based on computers. Nature consists of very simple rules. You reiterate these rules trillions of times and then you obtain the complexity which is visible in the classical world. The simple rules discovered by E-infinity are that using the golden mean Hausdorff dimension which represents an elementary random Cantor set can produce the result of a cellular automata with infinite capacity. In other words you do not even need a computer. The universe possesses an infinite computer because it possesses the golden mean. You probably recall the work of Renate Loll popularized in a Scientific American article published in 2008. What Renate Loll, Jon Ambjorn and their colleague did in this remarkable paper was reproducing some aspects of Mohamed El Naschie’s work without using golden mean Cantor sets. They replaced this powerful mathematical tool by the best computer capacity they have at present. If they want to find precisely the same result found by El Naschie, then all what they need is to find an infinitely strong computer. I am sure the reader sees that this strategy is misguided and upside down. Instead of finding an infinitely strong computer, we should find a theoretical solution. This theoretical solution happens to be the golden mean geometry and topology of E-infinity theory.

@Jason said,

“

I meant to direct my comments to Annonymous, not Charles. But they are probably the same person. Blogmaster, can you check whether the IP addresses of El Naschie’s supporters are being used to post under different names? They often do that.”Based on the IP addresses, it look like the commenters are different people.

Wreaver, thank you for checking! I’m amazed actually.

Blogmaster, Could you explain to Jason whoever he is that it does not matter at all whether El Naschie has one supporter or one million supporters. When dealing with science, it is not majority rule. At its purest mathematical level it should be a matter of right or wrong. Stringent logic and accurate experimental measures are all what is required. Oliver Cromwell said a few good men are better than numbers. I am sure he did not mean number theory but you get my point. Science is not democratic. Science has nothing to do with prizes. All are equal in the presence of science. Jason could have hundreds of blogs together with his buddies John Baez and Martin Klicken but this changes nothing. Plato considered democracy to be the ruling of the mob. For practical reasons democracy was used as the lesser evil in political life. In science there is no democracy. There is no equality in science between those who know and those who do not know. Apart from academic qualifications there are some tell tale indications. Just as string gauge indicates cracks, spending day and night on obscene blogs defaming people is a good indication for moral and mental inferiority. As an example of considerable pedagogical value you should have a look at Mr. Jason’s blog which he so affectionately dedicates to Prof. El Naschie. Nothing is beneath this biological unit who has no respect, even for itself. I know it is all a waste as usual. It is the internet and blog mentality.

Hi Gerhard, You and I are in agreement that science isn’t democratic, and that how many supporters El Naschie has on Internet forums doesn’t determine the correctness of his theories.

But it is well known and documented on my blog that his most outspoken handful of backers post under many assumed names, sometimes even submitting the exact same screed to different sites under different names. I think that’s hilarious, and so do my readers.

I was just expressing surprise that on Martial Culture the Naschienal Socialists have their own IP addresses. Nothing to get snippy about. I am acknowledging their individuality.

By the way John Baez doesn’t consider himself my buddy, to say the least. If you read El Naschie Watch you’d know that.

Gerhard, by the way, can you give us any news about El Naschie’s state of health? Or about Chaos, Solitons and Fractals? Thanks!

And of course we are curious to know whether Gerhard is your real name. I blog under my own name. What is your connection to El Naschie? What is your educational background? Where do you live?

If it pleases you Jason, Mohamed has moved from the here to the hereafter. That would not mean he is dead. In fact you are the one who is really dead. Your conscience is dead. Your morality never existed in the first place and your brain ceased to function God knows how long ago. Compared to you Elvis Presley is a truly dead person ……. One day very soon you will be envying Salman Rushdie in his hey days. Don’t get worried, you are a stylish thug. I am sure this gives you food for thought and inspiration for further perverted phrases, pictures and ideas. One thing got me worried which is the considerable deterioration in your English. You have three styles. That imitating John Baez and I must admit he is the one with the best English between your three alter egos. The second style is that of Martin Klicken. Although it is written, you can hear the thick German accent of Die Zeit’s pseudo editor Christoph Drosser similar only to those we hear in Colditz. Finally there is this ridiculous English of the Egyptian Said. Every word written recently on your blog sounds like this poor soul who was never ever able to speak English properly although he was a fugitive in the States for a considerable amount of time evading a three year hard labor sentence in Egypt. One hell of a company you have for yourself Jason. By the way, perhaps you like to tell us all your home address and your educational background, if any.

Gerhard, I live in Seattle and have a PhD in pure math. I have Erdos number 2 as stated in my blogger profile. My home address can be easily found using search engines, since I blog under my own name. But I asked you first about yourself, and you haven’t answered.

You are wrong to equate the alter egos as you call them. They are real, distinct people. As to the one you call Said: I do not know Elsheshtwi’s real name, but I do know that he is not Said. To the best of my knowledge Said Elnaschaie has never joined the El Naschie discussions in any of the contentious threads around the Internet.

Finally — Colditz?

Godwin!

Gerhard schrieb:

“The second style is that of Martin Klicken. Although it is written, you can hear the thick German accent of Die Zeit’s pseudo editor Christoph Drosser similar only to those we hear in Colditz.”

Hallo Gerhard,

Sie waren in Colditz? Das ist ja erstaunlich. Erinnert Sie jedes deutsche Wort an Ihre Erlebnisse in Colditz? Das tut mir sehr leid, aber es scheint Ihr höchstpersönliches Problem zu sein. Und es sagt mit Sicherheit sehr viel mehr über Sie persönlich aus, als über die Personen, die Sie hier so verzweifelt anzugreifen versuchen.

Schreiben Sie doch mal ein wenig über sich, Ihre Adresse und Ihren Hintergrund. Das wäre sicher auch interessant. Und schauen Sie gerne mal im El Naschie Watch Blog vorbei, wir würden uns sehr über Ihren Besuch freuen.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Martin Klicken

[wreaver note: Please keep things in English.]Wreaver, thanks for making an exception for Martin’s answer in his native tongue. Since he’s being compared to Nazis I think it’s appropriate to permit it.

Gerhard’s accusation is one of three recent comparisons by El Naschie’s supporters of their opponents to Hitler, Nazis, etc., of which I am aware. The argument of last resort is being trotted out with increasing frequency.

@Jason, I’m not really following the comments here very closely. But I’m fine with you guys debating things out here.

To be honest, I’ve never heard of El Naschie until you guys mentioned him.

At some point (when I get some free time) I’ll take a closer look at El Naschie’s work and decide for myself. At the moment, I don’t have enough information to have an opinion.

To the blogmaster. Just a friendly note. Wherever the name Jason appears in a blog, the scientific discussion invariably changes from scientific language to the language of the gutter. Mathematics and physics disappear and all what is left is mental and venereal diseases. Let us hope that this will not happen in your blog.

Annonymous,

When he finds time, I am content to let Wreaver be the judge of that.

Here is an English translation of Martin’s comment:

Gerhard wrote:

“The second style is that of Martin Klicken. Although it is written, you can hear the thick German accent of Die Zeit’s pseudo editor Christoph Drosser similar only to those we hear in Colditz.”

Hi Gerhard,

have you been to Colditz? That’s remarkable. Does each and every word of German you hear bring back your experiences from Colditz? I’m very sorry for you, but that appears to be your own emotional problem.

And for sure it says much more about you personally than about the people you try to attack here so desperately.

Why not write some more about yourself, your address and your background? That would be interesting too. And please feel invited to stop by the El Naschie Watch Blog. We would be very happy to welcome you there.

Sincerely,

Martin Klicken

El naschie is a real spark in the human written history. Al his predictions based on E-infinity theory are well verified. Among many and just to name:

1-The well experimentally verified results about fiber wool pioneered by Huan. Who showed that the Hausdorff dimension of fiber wool is to be about 4.2325, very close to El Naschie’s E-infinity dimension, 4.2360. According to Huan this reveals an optimal structure for wool fibers. This is an easy proved fact and it doesn’t need high energy.

2- A remarkable achievement of El naschie is his unique extra ordinary talent in revealing a deep connection between double slit experiment and particle physics. That is really breakthrough in the field.

3- El naschie is gifted in doing simple calculations and getting non-perturbative results. While ordinary people can get results by using supper computer in a one year, El naschie get the same results straight forward by counting on his fingers.

4- With a simple rope with knots El naschie could derive the spectrum of possible Elementary particles, and realy this is the discovery of the century.

Any one can just bring a rope with knots and could easily testify El naschie’s conjecture.

El naschie may be the greatest thinker in the history of mankind and his theory is the most important discovery since the invention of wheel. El naschie maybe the most remarkable event after cosmic big bang. His theory can describe every thing after big bang and I’m sure El naschie will extend his theory to accommodate what has been before big bang. Please don’t wonder it an E-infinity theory could deal with such a long history of time.

A few days ago I was accosted by an article entitled A multiverse of probabilities published in Physics World by the author Ben Freivogel (see p.40). I claim that the basic idea of the multiverse proposal is fractal. More precisely the idea is implicit in the work of Laurent Nottale and Garnet Ord and explicit in the work of M.S. El Naschie. If the readers could bear with me I would like to make this assertion plausible. A fractal implies infinity. In its simplest form it is the infinite ability of magnifying and zooming exactly as explained in the excellent World Scientific book of Nottale. A four dimensional fractal implies infinite numbers of concentric four dimensional spaces. Whether you think of the resulting structure as one Cantorian spacetime as presented by El Naschie or alternatively think of the structure as an infinite amount of four spacetimes connected together, it is only a matter of semantics. The way El Naschie adds probabilities together in an infinite series implies an infinite number of universes constituting a multiverse albeit an infinite one. The mathematics is very clear here. The simplest way to think of it is to put a four dimensional cube insider another four dimensional cube and so on ad infinitum. When you do the sums correctly which resembles a continued fracture, then you find that the final dimension is four plus the golden mean to the power three. E-infinity implies multiverse. The correctly weighted multiverse is a fractal spacetime with an expectation value for the topological dimension exactly equal four and an expectation value for the Hausdorff dimension exactly equal to four plus the golden mean to the power three. Some have suggested a connection to a Hilbert cube for instance Prof. Ji-Huan He from Shanghai. It is interesting to realize that there is now real experimental verification for the preceding theory. Finding the golden mean in quantum mechanics in the Helmholtz Centre in Berlin is a major discovery with incalculable consequences for the further development of fundamental physics. Nottale and Garnet Ord exactly as Richard Feynmann had the right haunch. Fractal spacetime is the answer. This is also obvious from the work of Tim Palmer which was published in the Royal Society a few months ago. Of course the establishment is not amused. Never the less science is not about being amused or not. Science is about being right. The New Scientist seems to have sensed the change of tide. Its newest edition carries the title Touching the multiverse, first hint that it really exists, Vol. 205, No. 2750. To be candid the idea is not that brand new. Feynmann’s path integral is the first version of this fast breaking idea. Everet’s multiuniverses theory which was championed by Murray Gellman is another version. However the discovery of the golden mean in the laboratory as a basis for quantum mechanics puts the whole thing in a completely new perspective. We are not philosophizing or theoretizing. The golden mean and thus El Naschie’s E-infinity theory is not a mere theory any more. You could say Nottale, Ord and El Naschie following Feynman discovered the real building blocks of quantum spacetime. These building blocks for which Gerard ‘tHooft searched for a long time are elementary random Cantor sets with a golden mean as a Hausdorff dimension. Similar qualitative ideas not using the quantitative golden mean approach is due to Fay Dowker and are called partially ordered sets. To go deeper than that in this theory will take us too far. I just wanted to give the unbiased reader a taste of the deep meaning of Nottale’s theory of fractal spacetime and what it really implies.

To: Researchers working on El Naschie E-infinity Cantorian-fractal spacetime theory of quantum high energy physics.

Dear All,

Even the most gullible, unsuspecting and least inclined to a conspiracy theory must be asking themselves by now why all this viscous attack not only against E-infinity and fractal spacetime as a theory but far worse against Prof. Ji-Huan He, L. Marek-Crnjac, Prof. Mohamed El Naschie, Gerardo Iovane and in fact every single member of the E-infinity group. Who is behind all that? Who is behind El Naschie Watch and the daily hundreds of perverted viscous comments aimed at any and everybody who has anything good to say about us, particularly Prof. El Naschie and Prof. He? Is it the establishment and what kind of establishment is this which is scared to death from a couple of simple equations and the word fractal spacetime? If I did not know better I would think that a Cantor set is where the devil himself lives or it is a code name similar to D-day or Dessert Storm only directed towards theoretical physics. In what follows I would like to explain to you in some detail that we have achieved a great deal with our theory. The work of Goldfain, Mohamed El Naschie and before them Nottale and Ord and Richard Feynman were all not in vain. I would like to explain that we are on the verge of a great truth and paradigm shift in physics. Some unteachable elements of the establishment are resorting to methods far away from science which failed in the past to prevent the inevitable. Others more cunning are working hard to translate our terminology to another terminology. The famous plagiarism which took place in Scientific American is only one of the very early and visible examples of this cunningness which is in reality lack of scientific honor as aptly described by one of us in a letter to the people concerned.

Let me start by first counting the unshakable final results which we have achieved on a few points and then we will move from there to discuss the wider picture and the experimental facts which are coming in daily. In brief we found the following results which will endure any future discoveries and could be counted as the absolutely secured part of what we have done.

1. The geometry of micro spacetime is best described by a fractal. This is the result of the work of Garnet Ord and Laurent Nottale following the pioneering idea of Richard Feynman and his path integral method.

2. The building blocks of spacetime are elementary random Cantor sets. The Hausdorff dimension of these elementary random Cantor sets is the golden mean. By varying the resolution you can obtain everything you want from an infinite collection of these Cantor sets. This is the essence of the work of Mohamed El Naschie, L. Crnjac, Ji-Huan He and also G. Iovane.

3. The expectation value for the Hausdorff dimension is 4 plus the golden mean to the power of three. This is 4.23606799. The expectation value for the topological dimension is exactly 4. The formal dimensionality is however infinite. This will bring us nearer to the theory of multiverse as I will explain later.

4. The most fundamental symmetry groups are the exceptional Lie symmetry groups. These are 8 in all forming a family. The most important member of this family is E8. What is important however is that the sum over all exceptional Lie symmetry group leads to a probability measure which is consistent with the random Cantor sets and its golden mean dimension. The sum of the dimensions of all eight groups was shown by El Naschie to give a total dimension equal 4 ¬α ̅=548 where ¬α ̅ = 137.

5. You can extend summing of an exceptional Lie group to compact and non-compact exceptional Lie groups and find 17 of them. The sum of all dimensions was shown by El Naschie to be 5α ̅=685. This theory led to speculation about an even larger symmetry group, namely E12 which is more important than the recently discovered E10 and E11 but I will not consider this part of secured knowledge and I will stop here, mentioning only that Ray Munroe was the first to find E12 before El Naschie.

As for the experimental verification we now have a few extremely important ones:

1. Indication of a Cantorian spacetime and a fractal spacetime coming from an analysis of the cosmic rays and microwave background radiation. The expert on the first is Goldfain and on the second Mohamed El Naschie and you can consult their publications on this. However there are many results independent of our group confirming the same and it would be great if Goldfain could write a report for us all on this for internal use on our blog.

2. The discovery of E8 in nanostructures and the golden mean in quantum mechanics which was recently made public by the Helmholtz Center in Germany is the most definite result confirming Cantorian spacetime geometry experimentally. I say this is the tip of the iceberg. From now on you will see the golden mean mushrooming everywhere in quantum mechanics and high energy physics.

Under these circumstances many people became worried and anxious that a group like ours, not considered to be specialists in mathematical physics and high energy particle physics should have made such a major step forwards and been able to predict the masses of elementary particles and the value of fundamental constants with such precision and ease. The frustration is to a certain extent understandable and the reason is the following.

1. Garnet Ord and Nottale did not use set theory per se. Mohamed El Naschie was also not the first to propose set theory in quantum mechanics and high energy physics. The first impulse came from somewhere completely different. They came from David Finkelstein and Carl Friedrich von Weizsaker. The two great scientists were not interested in details. However Stanley Gudder in the USA and his school as well as Fay Dowker in England and her collaborators felt that partially ordered sets could solve the problem of quantum mechanics. They were rather near but not quite there because they had no simple way of performing real quantitative calculations. Far better suited to quantum mechanics are random Cantor sets. When you use them you have the golden mean. And when you use the golden mean then you have at your hand an unrivalled number system which can handle any complex computation with unheard of simplicity. This was Mohamed El Naschie’s good luck or misfortune. By pure accident or providence El Naschie stumbled on a basic problem in fundamental mathematics. Basing your number system on the irrational number and the irrational golden mean system you can see the world with new eyes with unheard of simplicity. The recent book by Alexey Stakhov published in World Scientific under the title The Mathematics of Harmony is a profound meditation on this theme. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals had the honor of publishing the larger part of Prof. Stakhov’s work. I think when certain elements in the establishment realize that we surpassed everybody else, they panicked.

2. When certain elements of the establishment panicked, they published the paper in Scientific American in 2008. To overcome the problem of not having the golden mean they used the most powerful existing new generation of computers and pretended to use their expression, that they found the holy grail of theoretical physics by calculating the four dimensionalities of spacetime from first principles using a desktop computer. One of our associates joked about them by calculating the same dimension using a pocket calculator. In fact using the golden mean you can find everything by counting on your fingers, that is if you know the rules of the golden mean arithmetic. The rest is history and you can read it on the comments of this work in Scientific American.

3. An exceptional member of the mainstream who does not normally work in quantum mechanics is Prof. Tim Palmer of the University of Oxford. This professor realized the importance of fractals for quantum mechanics. His first paper did not refer to our group at all. Later on he revised his stance and he referred to Garnet Ord, Laurent Nottale and Mohamed El Naschie on the first page of his revised ArXived paper. Later on when this paper appeared in the Royal Society, the three names were relegated to the very rear of the paper. Never the less, the man at least had sufficient objectivity to acknowledge our priority. Of course he should have noticed that there is no difference between our work using Rene Thom/El Naschie VAK and his proposal. Spacetime and phase space are exchangeable at this high energy where time is spatialized. Anyway this was at least one of the establishment acknowledging that we were there first. On a personal level we have the greatest respect for Prof. Tim Palmer who is an exceptional meteorological scientist.

4. There is at least one earlier attempt to use elements out of our work and overlook mentioning our group. The first which comes to my mind is that of Dr. Garrett Lisi. He is not a mainstream scientist at all but he was supported by some people from Perimeter Inst. in Canada. Needless to say, most of what Lisi wrote about E8 was well known to us long ago and was published in Chaos, Solitons & Fractals years before Lisi’s paper. Of course the establishment in general neither likes Lisi’s nor our work and thus we and Lisi were equal although we were more equal than Lisi in being disliked by the establishment for reasons which have no scientific basis.

5. Here I must now mention the discovery of the important utility of the multiverse. The objective of this comment is really to talk about this subject. What I have written so far was just a summary of the past. I would like to show clearly that the multiverse theory is nothing but a new label for our Cantorian spacetime theory particularly when we couple it with the holographic principle of ‘tHooft.

ON THE EQUIVALENCE BETWEEN THE MULTIVERSE THEORY OF RAPHAEL BOUSSO AND E-INFINITY THEORY

A multiverse is a universe with an infinite number of pocket universes. Please note that the most important thing here is infinity. Fractal spacetime in the E-infinity version is an infinite dimensional universe. To avoid contradictions and inconsistencies, Bousso introduced causal patch measures. This measure corresponds to the relative topological probability used in E-infinity theory. However the really interesting point comes when you apply to both theories the holographic principle. You recall from E-infinity theory that the holographic manifold of E-infinity is Klein’s modular curve. This curve has 336 triangles. These 336 correspond to SL 2,7 which constitutes 336 isometries in two dimensions being the surface. They also correspond to 336 kissing points of 10 dimensional spheres. This in turn corresponds to 336 quantum curvatures in 8 dimensions. You can think of the 336 of Klein’s modular curve as cutting the 10 dimensional spaces of the kissing spheres and flattening them to a surface. You see know the equivalence between particle like states and isometries. Since the kissing points are the points of interactions, they can be regarded as messenger particles or massless gauge bosons. In fact following the holographic principle, they represent all that is going to be particle physics of the standard model later on at lower energy. To see the connection you just compare the 496 of E8 E8 of super string theory to the sum of the electromagnetism as represented by the 137 alpha bar when you add to it Einstein’s gravity in four dimensions which is 20 and the 336 of particle physics. Now you see that it does not completely add up. There are 3 missing. This 3 can be taken care of in two ways. Either you think of them as the only electromagnetic photons which are massive, namely W minus, W plus and Z zero. Thus we have 3 plus 336 equal 339. Plus 137 plus 20 which exactly matches the 496 of super strings as should be. But there is a better geometrical way to look at that which agrees exactly with the holographic multiverse interpretation of Raphael Bousso. Remember that we have to compactify Klein’s modular curve to come to a picture similar to that of Escher’s devil and angel. This is the hyperbolic structure well known from hyperbolic geometry. To reach the boundary we could walk for ever. If there is something like an outside observer he will find that we are nearing the boundary but becoming slower and slower and never ever reach the boundary which lies at infinity. Thus although we have a finite area, we have infinite distance to the boundary. If we identify this infinite distance with infinite time then our theory becomes identical to that of Bousso. The famous chaos scientist Otto Rössler compared the situation to a pseudo sphere of a certain cosmological model. In other words, Bousso’s theory, probably unknowingly, adopts words for word our theory and there is a one to one correspondence between our terminology and the new terminology. E-infinity is a multiverse theory. It always was and it will always be. You see we are at the cutting edge of everything in theoretical physics. In addition we can calculate things and not only philosophize about it. That is why some find El Naschie more than irritating and are extremely upset that we have been supporting him because quite honestly, without this help, he could not have achieved anything. In fact without our moral support he would not have survived the last operation which he had in London.

We must think about all these things and develop them further and keep each other informed. Let us, following Leo Tolstoy, try to forgive our opponents and wish them peace of their soul so that they can leave us in peace to complete our work.

Best wishes to everyone,

E-Infinity Communication

The experimental discovery of the golden mean should come as no surprise to anyone who is familiar with the VAK. The VAK attractor of Kolomogorov is a conjecture made by the great French topologist Rene Thom. It is nothing more than applying KAM theorem to quantum mechanic. KAM theorem states that the most stable stationary states which are called periodic orbits correspond to the most irrational winding numbers. The most irrational number is the golden mean. Applied to quantum mechanics, this means that the most stable particle which can be observed experimentally will relate to the golden mean. That is all folks. You see we theoretical physicists have always a minimum of new ideas. Our ideas are always extremely simple. We tend to prefer making very difficult computations rather than strenuous thinking using new ideas. All what distinguishes Mohamed El Naschie from the rest of us is that he was less lazy with regards to new ideas and extremely lazy when it comes to strenuous computations. That is how he came to the VAK and he tried it out. The discovery of the golden mean in quantum mechanic in Helmholtz Centre must be a triumph for the VAK. It is not a triumph for Mohamed El Naschie because no one person has ever done anything on his own. It is always the collective effort of humanity. If Rene Thom would be alive today, he would have bagged a Nobel Prize in physics besides his field medal in mathematics. If you do not want to give Mohamed El Naschie a prize because he is a Muslim, I assure you many Christians, Jews as well as atheists worked on the VAK. I am sure you will find somebody suitable who is not offensive to the establishment to give a Nobel Prize to for solving the mystery of quantum mechanics.

A Slovenian scientist and mathematician following Mohamed El Naschie expand the idea of mechanical oscillators. Many papers have been published on this subject by L. Marek-Crnjac. Take a two degree of freedom oscillator. Two masses connected by two linear springs. Write the equation of motion. Set the value for the masses as well as the spring constants equal unity. The secular equation is then simply a quadratic equation. The Eigen values are golden mean related. The only positive real Eigen value is the golden mean. Imagine now that you have infinitely many such oscillators connected together. Consequently you can estimate the Eigen value using two well known theorems on Eigen values. These are the Southwell theorem and the Dunkerly theorem. They correspond to what we have studied in school about joining electrical resistance of Ome’s law. When they are successive you add the inverses and when they are parallel you add them. Eigen values are frequencies. Frequencies are energy and energy is mass. Extrapolating the whole thing to quantum mechanics as argued by El Naschie and Marek-Crnjac you have another plausibility explanation for why the golden mean will pop up in any accurate measurement in quantum mechanics phenomenon.

“No one can take us out of the E-infinite paradise created for us by El naschie, I see it but I can’t believe it”

Ping-Bong He

El naschie is a real spark in the human written history, he is startling . Al his predictions based on E-infinity theory are well verified. Among many and just to name:

1-The well experimentally verified results about fiber wool pioneered by Huan. Who showed that the Hausdorff dimension of fiber wool is to be about 4.2325, very close to El Naschie’s E-infinity dimension, 4.2360. According to Huan this reveals an optimal structure for wool fibers. This is an easy proved fact and it doesn’t need high energy.

Hierarchy of wool fibers and its interpretation using E-infinity theory

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Volume 41, Issue 4, 30 August 2009, Pages 1839-1841

Ji-Huan He, Zhong-Fu Ren, Jie Fan, Lan Xu

2- A remarkable achievement of El naschie is his unique extra ordinary talent in revealing a deep connection between double slit experiment and particle physics. That is really a breakthrough in the field has never been acheived.

The two-slit experiment as the foundation of E-infinity of high energy physics

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Volume 25, Issue 3, August 2005, Pages 509-514

M.S. El Naschie

3- El naschie is gifted in doing simple calculations and getting non-perturbative results. While ordinary people can get results by using supper computer in a one year, El naschie get the same results straight forward by counting on his fingers without using computer at all. These are due his GOLDEN FINGERS.

On quarks confinement and asymptotic freedom

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Volume 37, Issue 5, September 2008, Pages 1289-1291

M.S. El Naschie

Quarks confinement

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Volume 37, Issue 1, July 2008, Pages 6-8

M.S. El Naschie

4- With a simple rope with knots El naschie could derive the spectrum of possible Elementary particles, and realy this is the discovery of the century.

Any one can just bring a rope with knots and could easily testify El naschie’s conjecture.

Fuzzy multi-instanton knots in the fabric of space–time and Dirac’s vacuum fluctuation

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Volume 38, Issue 5, December 2008, Pages 1260-1268

El naschie may be the greatest thinker in the history of mankind and his theory is the most important discovery since the invention of wheel. El naschie maybe the most remarkable event after cosmic big bang. His theory can describe every thing after big bang and I’m sure El naschie will extend his theory to accommodate what has been before big bang. Please don’t wonder it is an E-infinity theory that could deal with such a long history of time.

Few examples for an author called M. Agop who is trumpeting the virtue E-Infinity

theory, he has almost thirty nine articles containing in their

titles El naschie.

1- El Naschie s E-infinity theory and effects of nanoparticle clustering on the heat transport in

nanofluids

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Volume 37, Issue 5, September 2008, Pages 1269-1278

M. Agop, V. Paun, Anca Harabagiu

Abstract:

Effects of nanoparticle clustering on the heat transfer in nanofluids

using the scale relativity theory in the topological dimension DT = 3 are analyzed.

In the one-dimensional differentiable case, the clustering morphogenesis process is achieved

by cnoidal oscillation modes of the speed field. In such conjecture, a non-autonomous regime

implies a relation between the radius and growth speed of the cluster while, a quasi-autonomous

regime requires El Naschie s E-infinity theory through the cluster cluster coherence

(El Naschie global coherence). Moreover, these two regimes are separated by the golden mean.

In the one-dimensional non-differentiable case, the fractal kink spontaneously breaks

the vacuum symmetry of the fluid by tunneling and generates coherent structures.

This mechanism is similar to the one of superconductivity. Thus, the fractal potential

acts as an energy accumulator while, the fractal soliton, implies El Naschie s E-infinity theory

(El Naschie local coherence). Since all the properties of the speed field are transferred

to the thermal one, for a certain conditions of an external load (e.g. for a certain value

of thermal gradient) the soliton and fractal one breaks down (blows up) and release energy.

As result, the thermal conductibility in nanofluids unexpectedly increases.

Here, El Naschie s E-infinity theory interferes through El Naschie global and local coherences.

2- El Naschie s structures in the electrodynamics of polarizable media

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Volume 24, Issue 5, June 2005, Pages 1165-1181

M. Agop, I. Merches, V. Enache

Abstract:

Using the concept of combined field , an electrodynamics of polarizable media on a fractal

space time is constructed. In this context, using the scale relativity theory, the permanent

electric moment, the induced electric moment, the vacuum fluctuations, the paraelectrics,

the diaelectrics, the electric Zeeman-type effect, the electric Einstein de Haas-type effect,

the electric Aharonov Bohm-type effect, the superconductors in the combined field , the double

layers as coherent structures, the magnetic Aharonov Casher-type effect, are analyzed.

Correspondence with the E-infinity space time is accomplished either by admitting an

anomal electric Zeeman-type effect, or through a fractal string as in the case of a

superconductor in combined field , or, by phase coherence of the electron ion pairs from

the electric double layers (El Naschie s coherence). Moreover, the electric double layer or

multiple layer may be considered as two-dimensional projections of the same El Naschie s fractal

strings (higher-dimensional strings in E-infinty space time).

Please the reader should be careful about the new concept of El Naschie global and local

coherences and the ability of E-infinity for explaining every

thing you can imagine. I advice every readers to give a look at

this author Agop

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleListURL&_method=list&_ArticleListID=854751840&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=57e20c10dbdce6aebbbc81f36416a702

His articles are really endless kind of joy and great virtue of entertaining as the articles

of El naschie himself. Elseiver could distribute these articles as jokes and I bet that they

would be more profitable than distributing them as scientific papers.

For the sake of entertaining, we present another article for this

miraculous author M. Agop trumpeting the virtue of the great

El-naschie’s E-infinity theory.

Ball lightning as a self-organizing process of a plasma plasma interface and El Naschie s

E-infinity space time

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Volume 33, Issue 3, August 2007, Pages 754-769

M. Agop, C. Murgulet

Abstract:

In the fractal space time theories, some properties of a ball lightning (BL)

are established: the oscillation regimes, the hysteresis, the distributions

of the potential, field and charge etc. In such a context, the Feynman El Naschie

hypothesis on the universality of the dipole dipole interaction is confirmed and

a connection between El Naschie s E-infinity space time and Feigenbaum Goldfain

conjecture is given.

In this enlightening article, one finds the name of the great man El naschie

associated with Feynman, which remembers us for the association of Bose and

Einstein. Can the great man tell us what is Feynman-El naschie

hypothesis.!!!!, and if you use fractal space time or not or he

does not use fractals at all. By the way, Feynman had only 35

published papers, do you consider him as an average physicist.

Feynman’s prolificity can not match yours.

http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?rawcmd=FIND+A+FEYNMAN&FORMAT=wwwcitesummary&SEQUENCE=

Finally your miraculous and ridiculous articles and even those based on

them are not even wrong, they are non sense. No respectable journal will

ever accept a paper discussing your theory

In fact there is a french article, dated back 2007, about Nottale who is one of the associate editor of CSF, and as a by product the article catched the case of El naschie.

http://www.archipel.uqam.ca/481/01/gingras_bontems_SSI.pdf

a

nd

cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=20046891

The article is a biblometeric study, and you can see how the scintific corruption can take place. There many people involved in that matter, the study mentioned El naschie, sidharth, Agop, Castro and Ord.

Nottale is not a prominent french scintist at all.

I hope that the great man El naschie will sue those people who wrote this article after carefully reading it . I think the great is a multi-lingual one

E-Infinity

March 11, 2010 at 4:54 am

A Slovenian scientist and mathematician following Mohamed El Naschie expand the idea of mechanical oscillators. Many papers have been published on this subject by L. Marek-Crnjac. Take a two degree of freedom oscillator. Two masses connected by two linear springs. Write the equation of motion. Set the value for the masses as well as the spring constants equal unity. The secular equation is then simply a quadratic equation. The Eigen values are golden mean related. The only positive real Eigen value is the golden mean. Imagine now that you have infinitely many such oscillators connected together. Consequently you can estimate the Eigen value using two well known theorems on Eigen values. These are the Southwell theorem and the Dunkerly theorem. They correspond to what we have studied in school about joining electrical resistance of Ome’s law. When they are successive you add the inverses and when they are parallel you add them. Eigen values are frequencies. Frequencies are energy and energy is mass. Extrapolating the whole thing to quantum mechanics as argued by El Naschie and Marek-Crnjac you have another plausibility explanation for why the golden mean will pop up in any accurate measurement in quantum mechanics phenomenon.

While I was fine with people debating things out here as long as people tried to keep things civil, there’s been a number of comments (that I haven’t let through) that are just Ad Hominem attacks (and don’t even try to discuss thing cogently). Thus, I’m closing down commenting on this one post.